Archive for June, 2009

What Liberals “Believe”

Monday, June 8th, 2009

I like the fact that liberals are back. It is becoming easier and easier to declare the solutions to certain problems “liberal” solutions; easier to argue that government, well run, has a place in the lives the people; easier to self-identify as a liberal in mixed company. As a contribution to this welcome reemergence of liberalism, I would like to discuss one of the key differences between liberals and conservatives, a difference that, I believe, defines what is unique about liberalism: its relationship to belief.

Liberals and conservatives do not have different beliefs. They have a different relationship to belief. Conservatives are committed to belief. This means that they are always committed to a certain content, a certain set of statements, which always carry the weight of moral certainty:  “Marriage is between a man and a woman,” “Abortion is murder,” “Human life begins at the moment of conception,” “Government is the problem, not the answer.” It is wise to remember, though, that in the not-too-distant past there were other statements of belief that were passionately defended: “Slaves do not love their children the way we love our children,” “Jews are killing Christian children to use their blood in making matzah,” Women are not rational.”  The trouble with belief is that the latter set of statements can be, and have been, held with just as much fervor and moral certainty as the former. (more…)

Obama and the Martial Art of Rhetoric

Monday, June 8th, 2009

In my last blog, I talked about how the UFC is a great illustration of paradigm change, how a fighter can create a new style of fighting that renders the older styles obsolete, but how the old styles struggle along from defeat to defeat until they are finally done. obama speech

As I was writing that posting, I couldn’t help but think about Barack Obama and the Republicans’ efforts to attack him on everything from the stimulus package to the nomination of Sonia Sotomayor to his speech in Cairo on America’s role in the middle east.  The Republican attack machine right now is simply going through the motions that have always worked for them. Attack. Smear. Take the pettiest angle on any issue. Concentrate on trivia. Mischaracterize statements (e.g. Fox News’s attempt to portray Obama’s Cairo speech as an “apology”).  These techniques once seemed unbeatable, and their originators seemed like political geniuses, but I think today that we can look back and draw some different lessons. (more…)

The Ultimate Fighting Championship and Paradigm Change

Monday, June 8th, 2009

On Saturday June 23, Lyoto Machida won the UFC (Ultimate Fighting Championship) light heavyweight championship after stopping champion Rashad Evans in the second round with a flurry of blows that, according to the moment’s conventional wisdom, he should not have been able to throw.

machida knockout

To save you the suspense, let me address right now why philosophers and other such deep thinkers should be drawn to the UFC and mixed martial arts: More than any phenomenon of today’s culture, the UFC provides one of the most direct, immediate and sometimes brutal example of paradigm change. What is accepted practice at one moment can change in a flash. Truths do not gradually blend into new truths. What happens is that old truths are blasted away in the blink of an eye. In the UFC we see this kind of explosive change all the time. In fact, what makes the UFC so interesting is that it has condensed hundreds of years of evolution into two decades. Sometimes, the creature called Mixed Martial Arts changes form perceptibly in the space of one five minute round. (more…)